10 Best Sites to Buy TikTok Likes in 2026 — Tested for Retention
Updated: August 27, 2026
The short answer
Promotid leads at 9.6/10 because it pairs like delivery to a view floor — likes arrive alongside enough views to keep the like-to-view ratio inside a plausible band. Every other provider here sells likes in isolation, which is how accounts end up with videos showing 900 likes against 1,100 views: a ratio no organic video on TikTok produces.
TokBoostly (9.3) is the fastest and the strongest pure-play specialist. SocialWick (9.0) is the best value if you are buying at volume.
The ranking at a glance
- Promotid — 9.6/10 — best overall, ratio-aware delivery
- TokBoostly — 9.3/10 — fastest, TikTok specialist
- SocialWick — 9.0/10 — best value at volume
- Viplikes — 8.7/10 — best multi-video distribution
- Twicsy — 8.5/10 — most predictable delivery
- Buzzoid — 8.2/10 — cheapest fast option
- Viralyft — 8.0/10 — competent mid-market
- SidesMedia — 7.8/10 — best support
- GetViral — 7.5/10 — smallest minimums
- Bulkoid — 7.2/10 — cheapest, highest drop
Likes are the cheapest metric to buy on TikTok and the easiest to get wrong, because the platform makes the resulting inconsistency public on the face of every video. Unlike Instagram, where a like count sits alone, TikTok displays likes directly against a view count that anyone can read. The ratio between them is the whole problem.
Our companion guides cover buying TikTok followers and buying TikTok views, which is the metric that actually drives distribution.
On this page
- The short answer
- The ranking at a glance
- Full comparison
- How we scored these services
- 1. Promotid
- 2. TokBoostly
- 3. SocialWick
- 4. Viplikes
- 5. Twicsy
- 6. Buzzoid
- 7. Viralyft
- 8. SidesMedia
- 9. GetViral
- 10. Bulkoid
- Buyer's guide
- The like-to-view ratio
- What to avoid
- What changed in this market
- Frequently asked questions
- A note on TikTok's terms of service
Full comparison
| Provider | Score | From / 1K | Delivery | Multi-Video Split | Drop Rate (30d) | Paired View Floor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promotid | 9.6 | $1.19 | 1–4 hrs | Yes, scheduled | ~5% | Yes |
| TokBoostly | 9.3 | $1.40 | 15–45 min | Manual only | ~6% | No |
| SocialWick | 9.0 | $0.99 | 1–5 hrs | Manual only | ~8% | No |
| Viplikes | 8.7 | $1.30 | 1–6 hrs | Yes, manual queue | ~9% | No |
| Twicsy | 8.5 | $1.45 | 30–90 min | Manual only | ~7% | No |
| Buzzoid | 8.2 | $1.09 | 15–60 min | No | ~10% | No |
| Viralyft | 8.0 | $1.70 | 2–8 hrs | No | ~9% | No |
| SidesMedia | 7.8 | $1.80 | 6–24 hrs | Manual only | ~8% | No |
| GetViral | 7.5 | $1.60 | 1–5 hrs | No | ~11% | No |
| Bulkoid | 7.2 | $0.79 | 30–90 min | No | ~16% | No |
"Paired view floor" means the provider delivers a proportionate view count alongside likes to keep the public ratio plausible. "Manual queue" means multi-video distribution is possible but requires you to allocate it yourself. Prices are entry-tier published rates.
How we scored these services
This is an evidence-based assessment rather than a purchase study. Providers were evaluated against published terms and pricing, aggregated buyer reporting across public review platforms and forum threads, and observable operating characteristics — trading history, disclosed entity, payment processing, and whether stated policies hold when buyers test them.
The weighting reflects how TikTok like purchases fail in practice:
- Ratio management (30%) — whether the provider prevents the like-to-view mismatch that TikTok displays publicly. Heaviest weight because it is the failure everyone can see.
- Delivery timing (25%) — speed into the first-hour window where engagement velocity influences distribution, and whether pacing is available.
- Drop rate (20%) — proportion removed within thirty days.
- Distribution control (15%) — whether an order can be spread across several videos.
- Security posture (10%) — password requirements, payment handling, data retention.
No provider here requires a TikTok password; any that did would be capped at 6.0.
1. Promotid — 9.6/10
Best overall. Promotid is the only service in this comparison that treats the like-to-view ratio as its problem rather than yours. Order likes and it delivers a proportionate view floor alongside them, keeping the publicly-visible ratio in the range organic videos actually produce — typically eight to fifteen percent of views on a well-performing clip.
Every competitor here sells likes as an isolated quantity. Order 1,000 likes from any of them onto a video sitting at 1,200 views and you have published an 83% like rate, which is not a strong video — it is an impossible one, visible to every person who scrolls past it.
It also supports scheduled distribution across multiple videos, has the lowest drop rate here at roughly 5%, and paces delivery across one to four hours rather than dumping. The TikTok likes packages set out the paired-view options against each tier.
Pros
- ✔ Paired view delivery keeps the public ratio plausible — unique here
- ✔ Scheduled distribution across multiple videos
- ✔ Lowest drop rate at roughly 5%
- ✔ Paced delivery rather than instant dumping
- ✔ No password or account access required
Cons
- ✖ More expensive than SocialWick, Buzzoid and Bulkoid
- ✖ Slower than TokBoostly if you need first-hour velocity specifically
- ✖ The paired view floor adds cost you may not want on already-viral videos
What to watch for
On a video already carrying heavy organic views, the paired view floor is redundant and you are paying for it. Promotid's advantage is largest on new or low-view videos and smallest on ones already performing.
2. TokBoostly — 9.3/10
Fastest, TikTok specialist. TokBoostly delivers likes faster than anything else here — commonly inside fifteen minutes — which is precisely the window that matters if your purpose is influencing early engagement velocity while TikTok is deciding how widely to push a video. As a TikTok-only operator its delivery infrastructure is more consistent than the generalists'.
Drop rate around 6% is second-best. It offers no view pairing and no automated multi-video split.
Pros
- ✔ Fastest delivery here, often under 15 minutes
- ✔ Drop rate around 6%, second-lowest
- ✔ TikTok-only focus with correspondingly reliable infrastructure
- ✔ Clean checkout with no upsell pressure
Cons
- ✖ No paired view delivery — ratio management is on you
- ✖ Multi-video distribution requires separate orders
- ✖ $1.40 is above the cheap tier
What to watch for
TokBoostly's speed only pays if the order is placed within the first hour or two of publishing. On an older video that speed buys nothing and the ratio risk remains.
3. SocialWick — 9.0/10
Best value at volume. At $0.99 with genuine volume discounts, SocialWick is the cheapest credible provider here and the sensible pick for sustained campaigns across many videos. Its 8% drop rate is middling and delivery is slower than the fast tier, but neither is disqualifying at this price.
Pros
- ✔ $0.99 per thousand with steep volume discounts
- ✔ Established operator with disclosed entity
- ✔ Granular package sizing
- ✔ Reliable within its stated delivery window
Cons
- ✖ No paired view delivery
- ✖ Drop rate around 8%
- ✖ Delivery of 1 to 5 hours is loosely predicted
What to watch for
Cheap likes across many videos is a better use of SocialWick than cheap likes concentrated on one. The price advantage compounds across a campaign and evaporates on a single order.
4. Viplikes — 8.7/10
Best multi-video distribution. Viplikes lets you queue an order across several video URLs at checkout, which is the closest thing to Promotid's scheduling available elsewhere on this list. For creators publishing daily who want a consistent lift rather than one standout video, that is the practical feature.
Pros
- ✔ Multi-video queue at checkout
- ✔ Full range of TikTok metrics from one provider
- ✔ Reasonable $1.30 entry price
Cons
- ✖ Drop rate around 9%
- ✖ Queue is manual — no scheduling, just batch allocation
- ✖ No paired view delivery
What to watch for
Buying likes and views from Viplikes together means both come from the same account pool, which correlates the two metrics in a way that is easier to detect than either alone.
5. Twicsy — 8.5/10
Most predictable delivery. Twicsy's TikTok like product does exactly what the order page says, when it says, without variance. That reliability is worth something on time-sensitive orders even though nothing else about the service stands out.
Pros
- ✔ Delivery timing is genuinely predictable
- ✔ Drop rate around 7%
- ✔ Long trading history and stable payment processing
Cons
- ✖ $1.45 is mid-to-high for what is offered
- ✖ No paired view delivery or automated distribution
- ✖ Email-only support
What to watch for
Predictability is Twicsy's whole proposition here. If timing is not your constraint, cheaper providers deliver the same thing.
6. Buzzoid — 8.2/10
Cheapest fast option. Buzzoid combines sub-hour delivery with a $1.09 price, which is a genuinely useful combination for lifting early velocity on a budget. The cost is a 10% drop rate and no distribution capability whatsoever.
Pros
- ✔ Fast and cheap simultaneously — rare combination
- ✔ Small minimums for trialling
- ✔ Simple checkout
Cons
- ✖ Drop rate around 10%
- ✖ No multi-video distribution
- ✖ Instant delivery produces a sharp engagement spike
What to watch for
An instant thousand likes on a video with two hundred views is the most recognisable purchased-engagement pattern on the platform. Buzzoid makes that mistake easy to make.
7. Viralyft — 8.0/10
Competent mid-market. Viralyft delivers reliably within a wide window at a price above the median with a drop rate around 9%. Nothing is wrong with it and nothing recommends it over the six providers above.
Pros
- ✔ Consistent delivery within its stated window
- ✔ Responsive support for its tier
- ✔ No password requirement
Cons
- ✖ $1.70 is expensive relative to SocialWick and Buzzoid
- ✖ Delivery of 2 to 8 hours
- ✖ No distribution or pairing features
What to watch for
There is no order profile where Viralyft is the optimal choice on this list.
8. SidesMedia — 7.8/10
Best support. SidesMedia resolves problems rather than acknowledging them, which is worth more than it sounds in a category where partial deliveries are common and most support is a ticket queue. The trade is speed — six to twenty-four hours is far too slow for first-hour velocity work.
Pros
- ✔ Best support responsiveness in this comparison
- ✔ Drop rate around 8%
- ✔ Manual multi-video allocation available
Cons
- ✖ Delivery of 6 to 24 hours misses the window that matters
- ✖ $1.80 is the second-highest price here
- ✖ No paired view delivery
What to watch for
Slow like delivery is worse than slow follower delivery, because likes only influence distribution inside a narrow early window that SidesMedia routinely misses.
9. GetViral — 7.5/10
Smallest minimums. GetViral sells likes in quantities small enough for accounts averaging a few dozen per video, which most providers cannot service. That is the reason to use it and the only one.
Pros
- ✔ Genuinely small minimum orders
- ✔ Delivery inside five hours
- ✔ Straightforward checkout
Cons
- ✖ Drop rate around 11%
- ✖ $1.60 is expensive at any scale
- ✖ No distribution or pairing features
What to watch for
Small-order pricing is proportionally worse than the per-thousand rate suggests.
10. Bulkoid — 7.2/10
Cheapest, highest drop. At $0.79 Bulkoid is the lowest price in this guide and its 16% drop rate is roughly triple Promotid's. Nearly one in six purchased likes disappears inside a month with no recourse.
Pros
- ✔ Lowest price here by a clear margin
- ✔ Fast delivery inside 90 minutes
- ✔ No password requirement
Cons
- ✖ Drop rate around 16%, worst in this comparison
- ✖ No refill or refund mechanism
- ✖ No distribution or pairing features
What to watch for
A visible like count that falls over the following weeks is worse than a lower count that holds, because the decline is what people notice.
Buyer's guide
Buy inside the first ninety minutes or not at all
TikTok evaluates a video's early engagement to decide how far to push it into the For You page. Likes landing in the first sixty to ninety minutes carry real weight in that evaluation. Likes landing on day two carry almost none and simply sit there looking odd. If your goal is distribution rather than appearance, the order has to be timed to the upload.
Never let the like count approach the view count
This is the defining constraint of TikTok like purchasing and the one most buyers ignore. Organic videos typically show likes at eight to fifteen percent of views; a strong video might reach twenty. A video displaying likes at fifty or eighty percent of views is announcing the purchase to every viewer. Check the current view count before ordering and size accordingly.
Spread across videos rather than concentrating
A profile grid where one video shows 4,000 likes and the surrounding fifteen show 90 is a worse outcome than not buying. Distributing the same quantity across four or five recent uploads produces a lift that reads as a better week rather than a purchase.
Likes do less for distribution than views
Of the engagement signals TikTok weighs, watch-through rate and completion do the most work, shares and rewatches next, likes somewhat less. Buying likes is the cheapest intervention available and correspondingly the weakest one. If the objective is genuinely more reach, views and watch time are the better purchase.
Do not buy likes on videos that are underperforming for content reasons
Purchased likes on a video people are scrolling past in two seconds produces a signal mismatch — high likes against poor watch-through — that is more suspicious to TikTok's systems than low engagement across the board. Boosting is only useful on content that is retaining the viewers it reaches.
The like-to-view ratio
TikTok makes this harder than any other platform by displaying both numbers side by side on every video, permanently and publicly.
Organic like rates cluster tightly. Across most content categories a video will show likes somewhere between eight and fifteen percent of its view count. Exceptional videos push to twenty or a little beyond. Below five percent suggests the video reached people who did not care for it; above twenty-five percent essentially does not happen at any scale, because the same recommendation system that generates views does not selectively deliver videos only to people who will like them.
That means a like purchase has a hard ceiling defined by the video's current views, and the ceiling moves as views accumulate. A video at 500 views can absorb perhaps 60 likes before the ratio strains. The same video at 20,000 views can absorb 2,500 comfortably.
Two workable approaches follow. Either buy views first and likes after, sizing the like order against the new view count — or use a provider that delivers a proportionate view floor with the likes, which is what puts Promotid at the top of this comparison. Buying likes alone onto a low-view video is the one approach that reliably produces a worse-looking profile than doing nothing.
What to avoid
- Any provider requesting your password. A video URL is all that is required.
- Like orders that push past roughly 20% of the video's view count. The single most visible error in this category.
- Buying likes on videos older than a day or two. No distribution benefit and an obvious anomaly.
- Concentrating an order on one video. Grid inconsistency is more noticeable than a modest lift across several.
- Prices below roughly $0.70 per thousand. Below that the drop rates make the purchase self-defeating.
- Buying likes to rescue content that is not retaining viewers. It creates a worse signal than low engagement does.
What changed in this market
Prices collapsed and quality separated. TikTok likes are now among the cheapest engagement metrics available anywhere, and the spread between the best and worst providers has moved from price to drop rate and capability. A dollar buys a thousand likes almost everywhere; what differs is how many are still there next month.
View pairing appeared as a product feature. The ratio problem has always existed and buyers have always been left to manage it. Providers only recently began solving it by bundling a proportionate view floor, which is currently the clearest differentiator in the category.
TikTok's sweeps got less frequent and larger. Drop rates arrive in steps rather than gradually, which makes a provider's thirty-day figure a lottery depending on when you order relative to the last sweep. The providers with consistently low drop rates are sourcing better accounts, not timing sweeps more cleverly.
Frequently asked questions
Does buying TikTok likes actually work?
Modestly, and only within a narrow window. Likes contribute to the early engagement signals TikTok uses to decide distribution, so an order landing in the first ninety minutes after upload can help a video get pushed further. Likes landing later do nothing for distribution and only change how the video looks. Views and watch-through are substantially stronger levers if reach is the goal.
How much is 100 likes on TikTok?
At the rates published by providers here, a hundred likes costs between roughly eight and eighteen cents at the per-thousand rate, though almost no provider sells in quantities that small — minimums typically start at a few hundred. GetViral is the exception on this list, and its small-order pricing is proportionally higher than its headline rate.
Can you tell if someone bought TikTok likes?
On TikTok, more easily than anywhere else, because the like count and view count sit next to each other on every video. A like rate above roughly twenty-five percent of views is the giveaway, followed by one video wildly outperforming its neighbours on the profile grid, and likes appearing in a compressed burst rather than accumulating.
Where can I buy the cheapest TikTok likes?
Bulkoid at $0.79 per thousand is the lowest price in this comparison, followed by SocialWick at $0.99 and Buzzoid at $1.09. Bulkoid's 16% drop rate makes its effective cost closer to $0.94 per surviving thousand, which narrows the gap considerably. SocialWick is generally the better value once retention is accounted for.
Do purchased TikTok likes disappear?
A proportion does, ranging from roughly 5% to 16% over thirty days across the providers here. Removal happens in batches when TikTok actions the accounts that placed the likes, so the count tends to step down rather than decline smoothly.
Will buying likes get my TikTok account banned?
Bans for purchased likes alone are rare. The realistic outcomes are removal of the likes during a sweep and, on accounts with a pattern of it, reduced distribution or monetisation eligibility. Likes carry lower enforcement risk than followers because the receiving account did not solicit them in any way the platform can attribute.
How many likes should I buy per video?
No more than about fifteen percent of the video's current view count, and ideally closer to ten. On a video at 2,000 views that is roughly 200 to 300 likes. If that seems too small to be worth buying, the correct conclusion is that the video needs views first, not that the like order should be larger.
Should I buy likes or views for TikTok?
Views, in almost every case. TikTok's distribution weighs watch-through and completion far more heavily than likes, so views bought with real watch time move the algorithm in a way likes do not. Likes are worth adding afterwards to keep the ratio looking normal against the new view count — which is the opposite of the order most buyers use.
A note on TikTok's terms of service
Buying likes violates TikTok's Terms of Service and Community Guidelines, which prohibit artificially inflating engagement. TikTok's Community Guidelines describe the enforcement approach, which principally targets the accounts supplying inauthentic engagement rather than those receiving it.
This comparison exists because the purchase happens regardless and provider choice changes the outcome materially — particularly on TikTok, where a badly-sized order produces a permanent, public inconsistency on the face of the video. None of this suggests purchased likes substitute for content that earns them. On a video people are not watching, bought likes make the underlying problem more legible rather than less.
For broader context, Pew Research Center publishes ongoing platform usage data and Statista tracks creator economy figures.