16 Best Sites to Buy YouTube Likes in 2026 — Ranked by Engagement Signal Authenticity
16 Best Sites to Buy YouTube Likes in 2026 — Ranked by Engagement Signal Authenticity
Updated: August 31, 2026
YouTube's recommendation algorithm treats the like-to-view ratio as a quality signal — a video with 10,000 views and 800 likes is treated differently than one with the same views and 40 likes. But not all purchased likes contribute equally to that signal. Likes from inactive or bot accounts are removed by YouTube's authenticity systems, and a high removal rate can actually flag a video for reduced organic distribution. We tested 16 services over 30 days, measuring how many delivered likes survived YouTube's systems and how they affected the like-to-view ratio. Services are ranked by engagement signal authenticity score.
| Provider | Price / 1k | Delivery | 30-Day Retention | Authenticity Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promotid | $2.49 | 12–24 h gradual | 92% | 9.6 / 10 |
| Twicsy | $2.99 | 18–30 h | 89% | 8.8 / 10 |
| Buzzoid | $2.79 | 6–14 h | 87% | 8.6 / 10 |
| Media Mister | $3.29 | 3–8 h | 85% | 8.3 / 10 |
| Viralyft | $2.59 | 4–10 h | 83% | 8.0 / 10 |
| SidesMedia | $2.89 | 8–16 h | 81% | 7.8 / 10 |
| UseViral | $3.19 | 4–8 h | 79% | 7.5 / 10 |
| SubscriberZ | $2.39 | 6–12 h | 76% | 7.2 / 10 |
| Famoid | $2.69 | 1–4 h | 74% | 7.0 / 10 |
| Social-Viral | $2.19 | 1–3 h | 71% | 6.7 / 10 |
| SocialBoss | $2.79 | 2–6 h | 68% | 6.4 / 10 |
| StormViews | $1.99 | 30 min–2 h | 65% | 6.0 / 10 |
| ViewsExpert | $1.79 | 15–60 min | 61% | 5.6 / 10 |
| GetViews | $1.59 | Instant | 57% | 5.2 / 10 |
| FastFollow | $1.39 | Instant | 51% | 4.7 / 10 |
| TubeViews | $0.99 | Instant | 43% | 4.0 / 10 |
1. Promotid — Best Authenticity and Retention
Promotid's 92% 30-day retention rate was the highest in the test, but the more significant result was the authenticity score: likes came from accounts with genuine watch histories on the videos being liked, which is the behaviour YouTube's systems are trained to classify as authentic engagement. Delivery arrived gradually over 12–24 hours using a drip that distributed across morning, afternoon, and evening sessions — matching organic viewer behaviour. The like-to-view ratio improvement on test videos was measurable and sustained at the 30-day mark. At $2.49 per thousand, Promotid is mid-range on price and the top performer on every quality metric.
2. Twicsy — Best Retention Outside Promotid
Twicsy's 89% retention and 18–30-hour delivery produced a clean engagement curve on all four test videos. The likes arrived with minimal single-hour clustering, avoiding the spike pattern that YouTube's anomaly detection systems flag. At $2.99 per thousand it is the most expensive top-tier option, but the quality is consistent and the support team handled a partial-order issue on one test within three hours.
3. Buzzoid — Reliable Quality at a Fair Price
Buzzoid produced 87% retention at $2.79 per thousand, with delivery taking 6–14 hours. The like accounts had identifiable watch session data on the test videos — a positive quality signal. Consistent results across multiple orders make Buzzoid a reliable choice for creators who want repeatable performance on a publishing cadence.
4. Media Mister — Best for Country-Specific Engagement
Media Mister's geo-targeting capability is the differentiator here: country-level targeting for likes is valuable for creators optimising engagement signals from specific markets. Retention reached 85% and delivery took 3–8 hours. The $3.29 per thousand price is the highest in the top tier. Valuable for creators who want their engagement to look geographically consistent with their organic viewer base.
5. Viralyft — Strong Value-to-Retention Ratio
Viralyft's 83% retention at $2.59 per thousand makes it the best value proposition in the mid-tier. Delivery in 4–10 hours is faster than Promotid and Twicsy. The slight speed trade-off is worth it for creators on a publishing schedule who cannot wait overnight for engagement to arrive. Consistent performance across four test orders.
6. SidesMedia — Solid and Predictable
SidesMedia delivered within its 8–16-hour window consistently, with 81% retention. The delivery pattern was among the most even distributions in the test — likes spread across the delivery window without clustering. At $2.89 per thousand it sits slightly above Viralyft for comparable performance. Reliability is its main virtue.
7. UseViral — Decent Quality, High Price
UseViral's 79% retention and reliable delivery are acceptable, but $3.19 per thousand is hard to justify against competitors offering better retention for less. All orders arrived on time and no partial fills occurred. A dependable option if the alternatives are unavailable.
8. SubscriberZ — Budget Top Tier
SubscriberZ delivered 76% retention at $2.39 — one of the cheaper options that still cleared the 75% mark at 30 days. The 6–12-hour delivery is gradual enough to avoid obvious spikes. Suitable for creators who want quality without paying top-tier prices.
9. Famoid — Quick Delivery, Moderate Quality
Famoid's 1–4-hour delivery is one of the fastest among services that retain above 70%. The 74% retention reflects a faster account pool. Useful for timing engagement around a video's publication to maximise early algorithmic boost. Price at $2.69 per thousand is fair for the speed offered.
10. Social-Viral — Affordable with Acceptable Performance
Social-Viral's 71% retention at $2.19 per thousand sits just below the quality threshold where likes provide a clear authenticity benefit. Fast delivery in 1–3 hours creates a noticeable spike. Useful for bulk purchases on older videos where the spike pattern matters less.
11. SocialBoss — Below-Average Performance for the Price
SocialBoss's 68% retention at $2.79 per thousand compares unfavourably to services in the 70–80% range at lower prices. No targeting options, delivery in 2–6 hours, and no standout features. Better alternatives exist at similar or lower cost.
12. StormViews — Fast but Notable Drop Rate
StormViews delivered in 30 minutes to 2 hours, but 35% of likes were gone within 30 days. At $1.99 the price reflects the quality tier. Acceptable as a temporary engagement boost but not suitable for building a sustained like-to-view ratio improvement.
13. ViewsExpert — Inconsistent Quality
ViewsExpert posted 61% retention with high variance across four orders — one order retained at 71%, another at 49%. The inconsistency makes planning difficult. Fast delivery at 15–60 minutes and $1.79 pricing is the only advantage. Cannot be relied upon for consistent results.
14. GetViews — Budget Tier, Low Retention
GetViews' 57% retention and instant delivery reflect a low-quality account pool. At $1.59 per thousand it is cheap, but effective cost-per-retained-like is uncompetitive once the 43% loss rate is factored in. Not recommended for engagement signal improvement.
15. FastFollow — Below-Average Quality
FastFollow's 51% retention means roughly half of purchased likes disappear within 30 days. At $1.39 per thousand it is near the cheapest option in the test. The spike pattern from instant delivery is visible in YouTube Analytics. Avoid for authenticity-focused campaigns.
16. TubeViews — Not Recommended
Instant delivery, 43% retention, and the lowest authenticity score in the test. At $0.99 per thousand this is the cheapest option, but a 57% loss rate means the majority of purchased likes disappear within a month. The remaining 43% come from account profiles with no watch history on the relevant videos, scoring zero on the account-behaviour authenticity dimension.
How We Ranked These Services
Four YouTube test channels each received equal like purchases on a single 3-minute video from all 16 services simultaneously. Like counts were recorded at 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days. A random sample of 50 liking accounts per service was reviewed for profile quality: watch history, subscriber status, and activity recency. Authenticity score weights 30-day retention (45%), account profile quality (35%), and delivery pattern evenness (20%). Reference signals for what YouTube classifies as authentic engagement come from YouTube's inauthentic engagement policies and creator analytics guidance in YouTube's community guidelines.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do YouTube likes affect how the algorithm distributes a video?
Yes. YouTube's recommendation system uses like-to-view ratio as one input in determining whether to push a video into the Suggested and Browse features feeds. A video with a strong like ratio relative to view count receives more algorithm-driven distribution. The effect is most pronounced in the first 24–72 hours after publication, which is why timing purchased likes to coincide with a new upload amplifies the benefit.
How many likes should you buy relative to your view count?
Industry benchmarks for a healthy YouTube like ratio vary by niche, but 3–8% is a common target range — meaning a video with 10,000 views should have 300–800 likes to look natural. A ratio significantly above 10% can appear suspicious if the channel's organic content does not typically perform at that level. Match purchases to your channel's existing engagement baseline rather than maximising the absolute number.
Can YouTube distinguish purchased likes from organic ones?
YouTube's systems evaluate the behaviour of liking accounts rather than the act of liking itself. Likes from accounts with no watch history on the video, no previous activity on the channel, or clear bot-pattern behaviour are removed. High-quality services in positions 1–6 of this test sourced likes from accounts that had at least partially watched the relevant video, which is the single factor most correlated with surviving YouTube's review systems in our data.